Se

The group above 90% consisted of 13 players; the two highest in this
group were forwards. Three centers and cight guards composed the remainder of the
list. The next group consisted of 22 players, four of whon were centers, seven
were guards, and eleven were forwardse The group below 80% contained eleven
players, three centers, four forwards and four guards.

It should be pointed out that out of the high cight players from the
standpoint of playing efficiency, four of these players belong to School D, and
that the players ranked one and two in evaluation points carned per minute also
were from the same tcam,. Also, it should be noted that two players of School D
were ranked among those that were listed with zero ball handling errorse

On the basis of the data presented in Table V it would be interesting
to sclect an all-opposition team.

Summary and Conclusion

 

Research of this type depends to a great extent upon the accuracy of
the observers¢ Realizing this, the observers were very carefully selected fron
student majors and other intcrosted students, The same observers were used in all
the games and there is every reason to believe that tho results are very nearly
correcte

It is the opinion of the writers that this study has merit because:

1. It points out mistakes made during a game, thus causing the players to
be more conscious of there .

ée It stresses the importance of game fundanentals.s
3¢ It provides an itemized history of the contost.

4, It makes possible a more accurate means of conparing individuals ond teans.