136

him in 5th place for the squad. In errors for ball handling, he rated first with

a rate of 1.13%. As a guard he had an opportunity to recover rebounds off the
opponent's backboard to such an extent that he rated Noe 2 for the squad on a basis
of rebounds per minutee He passed the ball more than he caught it, and on the basis
of shots por minute there are only 3 players who took less shots, This player is
12th on the basis of personal fouls canmitted per minute. The data indicate that
he was an excellent ball ha ndler, and a good robound recoverer, but he did not
shoot enoughe On the basis of officiency his coach, teammates and freshmen rated
him ninthe

Player He Forwarde

 

Pla yer H was a forward with 74.5 minutes of playing time to his credit. He
carned 344 evaluation points and 30 score points, made 13 baskets (30.2%) and 4
free throws (66.7%) This player also had the highest number of shots attempted
per minute of play. On the ba&is of player oefficioncy he rated 93.0%. But on his
ball handling ability he had an error rating of 6.2%, or 5 times that of players
A and Ge He was the 8th player on the basis of time played and he ranked 8th on
the basis of personal foulse Whon it came to passing and catching the ball, he mado
22 more catches than passese This player was a good scorer but ho shot more than
any other player per minute of pla ye He made too many errors in boll handling and
in this departmont he ranked 135th. He ranked 7th on his playing cfficioncy, and
the players rated him 10th, the coach lith, .and the freshmen 12th.

Player I, Forwarde ‘

 

Player I was in the games for 70,5 minutes as a forward. He earned 395 eval~
vation points and 16 score points, and made 7 goals for 212% and threw 2 fouls for
33e3%.e On the basis of personal fouls per minute he was number one man with less
than any other mombor of the squad. He had a ball handling error rating of 420%
ond a playing efficiency of 91.7% As a forward he recovered enough balls from the
opponent's backboard per minute to rank as the Noe 2 man of the squide He also was
the Noe 3 man in recovering the ball off his own backboard, and he ranked 3rd on
the basis of total recoveries per minutes In the amount of playing time this player
ranked 9th and on the basis of playing efficieney he also ranked 9the Like the other
forwards, he also caught the ball more than he passed it and ranked 3rd in the
attempted goals per minute of playing times This player was good at recovering re-
bounds, not too good a shot, and among the 3 players to have an error rating over
4%, He did not camit many personal foulse He was rated 7th by the players, and
8th by the coach and freshmene

Player Je Forwarde

 

This man had a playing time of 40 minutese During this time he made 8 score
points, 3 goals (16.7%), 2 free throws (40%), and earned 395 evaluation pointse His
error rating in ball handling was 3.1% and his playing efficioncy rated at 916%.

He was 10th in the amount of time in home games and ranked 10th in playing efficiency.
As a forward he recovered the ball off his own backboard to rank 3rd on the per min»
ute basis, and caught the ball more than he passed ite As a forword he was not a
good shot as only one boy on the squad had a lower rank and the player who was lower
did not make a basket in his five attemptse He was ranked 8th by his tearmates, 6th
by the coach and 7th by the freshnens