12.

Player De Centcre

 

Player D was the fourth man on the squad to play over 200 minutes with a
total time of 221.5 minutes. He carned 33 score points and 1256 cvaluation points,
which was fourth high for the squade While playing he scored 14 goals (#8%) and
made 5 free throws (62.5%). In ball handling crrors he had a low score of 1.9% and
was one of the four men to score less thon 2% crrors. His all around playing offi-
ciency wos 94.9%, which was also fourth for the squade As far as ball handling was
concerned, he was third in the total number of passes and eatchese He ma de 17 moro
passes than catches. There were only four men on the squad that took fewer shots
per minute. The data show that this player handled the ball many times for a low
error rate of 1e870. He was second on the squad in evaluation points per minute
and that shows he did not shoot too oftene On ploying efficiency hewas the best
center on the squad, and the players, the coaeh and the freshmen all rated him as
the number four mone

Player Ee Forwards

 

This player was a forward and had 141e5 minutes of playing time to his ercdite
He earned 560 cvaluation points and 25 score points, He scored 10 goals (303%) and
made 5 free throws (71.4%). In ball handling he had an orror rate of 4.6 which wes
second highest on the squad. From the standpoint of player cffieicncy he ws 12the
There was only one other player on the squad that had a lower rate of personal
foulse Playor E played 141,5 minutes or over 35 games of 40 minutes cach ond made
only 3 personal fouls, He is the first player in the list to catch the ball more
than he passed it by 4 catches. He also is the first man on the list to be listed
as a forward onlye Player B played both forward and center during the season. It.
scoms to be a characteristic of the forward position to demand more catching than
passinge The data indicate a low personal foul rate, a poor efficiency rating as
compared to the players who played 200 minutes and an error rate in ball handling
4 times as high as that of players A and G He wos rated as sixth by his fellow
players and the freshmen, and seventh by the coache

Player F, Forwarde

 

This player was listed as a forward «nd he played 117 minutes, making 12 goals
(17,9%), and 8 free throws (57.1%). He carmed 628 evalwtion points and 32 score
points. On the player officioncy chart he rated 6th with a percentage of 94ele His
rate of crror in tmll handling was 2.070, which placed him in fifth place. Like the
preceding player, he had more catches than passes in ball handlinge Only one other
player (H) had more attempted shots per minute of play and only two squad menbers
made a smaller percentage of their shotse On balls recovered off his own backboard
he rates as the number one man, This is also truc for the recovory of his tcan-
mate's jump ballse On the basis of personal fouls por minute, this player ranked
12 th for the squad, only two maling more than he did, The data indicate that the
player was fairly efficient, but that his shooting average was far too lowe He
makes a first class man on handling rebounds off his oim backboard anf getting the
ball after a teammato'’s jump, but he committee too many personal fouls, His tcan-
mates, freshmen ond coach rated hin fifthe

Player G. Forward and Grarde

 

This playor was listed as both a forward and a guard. He played 100 minutes,
made 460 evaluation points and 10 score points, 4 goals (200%), and shot 2 frec
throws for 500% Hc carned a rating on player efficiency of 94.2%, which places