Se

The group above 90% consisted of 13 players; the two highost in this
group were forwards. Three centers and cight guards composed the remaindér of the
list. The next group consisted of 22 players, four of whom were centers, seven
wero guards, and eleven were forwardse The group below 80% contained eleven
players, three centers, four forwards and four guards.

It should be pointed out that out of the high cight players from the
standpoint of playing efficiency, four of these players belong to School D, and
that the players ranked one and two in evaluation points carned per ninute also
were from the same toam. Also, it should be noted that two players of School D
were ranked among those that were listed with zero ball handling errorse

On the basis of the data presented in Table V it would be interesting
to sclect an alleopposition teams

Sumary and Conclusion

 

Resoarch of this type depends to a great extent upon the accuracy of
the observers. Realizing this, the observers were very carefully selected fron
student majors and other intcrested studentse The same observers were uscd in all
the games and there is every reason to believe that the results are very nearly
correcte

It is tho opinion of the writers that this study has merit because:

1. It points out mistakos made during a game, thus causing the players to
be more conscious of there

2e It stresses the importance of game fundanentalse
Se It provides an itemized history of the contcst.

4, It makes possible a more accurate means of conparinz individuals ond teanse

* OK KK *K
*x K *K
* OK OK