De

In this tabulation of the percentage of goals made (see Table VI), one
can see that player C and player M have both the same score, 33e5%e However, play-
er C was the most valuable on the basis of other items. Player A with 32.6% is
undoubtedly more valuable than either. This method must be tempered with judgmente
In order to arrive at an index number for rating scoring ability an arbitrary for-
mula was used (see definition of terms, Noe 7)e This gives a rather high index
number which when reduced to a one=two-three basis rating gives a logical ordere

Errors in ball handling include the total number of wild passes, fumbles,
and held balls obtained by an opponent. In order to arrive at a ball handling error
rate, the total number of passes and catches was assumed to be an accurate index as
to the relative number of times chances for errors were presente By using the for=
mula given in definition of terms, Noe 8, an index was establishede The guards
handled the ball more often than did the forwards, and the two players with tho low~
est ball handling error rate (players A and G) are guards. Howevor, player G also
played as a forwarde The lowest error rate for a forward was 2.0 for playor Fe

In order to find further ratings for the purpose of analysis, the scores
from the evaluation chart were computed on a point per minute basis and a rating
from 1 to 13 given the various players. Tho material in this chart (Table VII) is
of value until one reaches the players with only a fow minutes of playing times
Here the chart breaks dovm bocause those playezs did not perform all of the items
mentioned, and aro rated too highly. This mtcrial is discussed somewhat in the
summaries dealing with the individual playcrse

 

 

 

TABLE VII.
Rating on Activitics per Minute* ° .
: : ° , 8

< s ie “| a = |
' * ota 3 4 22

iw ee gS § i ~ = A 4+. .

re eee ee oe ee ee ee a a
w LS V~ «WA 3 Q * in = : * te!
BiG SPE SSS SS tee! @
: : XS - <, ;

Aw. Sw. ee Et =* . & Se ™
2S & Se ess Sele ak £ ep BY
= « € Ss.t2% - a | Fé. 2 .-; & @&..%
$3 Sa S Ott te eS SS
Ss £ 8 Pt lteass Ga 8 8 8S: g

ee £2 Lg fa So 29 5 @ © FF FF Ss
Gry OuUCMQigse GIs GQ KZ S
: + 2 st 2 Se es SUS 1 11 [et 2. © @
Sf £@ eo 8 8 t 8 7 6 8 ¢ & & hu
oe ee ee 13 : ££ Ff © 8S
5 6. 4 2° OO 6 9 9 ; 8 © © 8
e+ ee 6 68 8 A 4 *n vw 8. $800
eos #4 8-48 6 Ct 1 _ 6B we © 8 SB
oe ee ee ee 12 “ee
ee ee ae ee 10 ius #8 «8s 4
oa a 2 a ee ee
48 w@ £6 ft te 6 3 ms €:1 PP Ss
oo ee ee ee ae 8 ¢ 8 48 5 OG
©. ewe Mw ae tS 6 S464 ££ 2 oe
“oe oe oe ee 5 a t¢- wet a OS

*A ranking of 1 is the best performancee