l2e

Player De Centcre

 

Player D was the fourth man on the squad to play over 200 minutes with a
total time of 22165 minutes. He carnecd 33 score points and 1256 cvaluation points,
which was fourth high for the squade While playing he scored 14 goals (#8%) and
made 5 free throws (62.5%). In ball handling crrors ho had a low score of 1.9% and
was one of the four men to score less than 2% errorse His all around playing offi-
cioney was 94.9%, which was also fourth for the squade As far as ball handling was
concerned, he was third in the total number of passes ond eatechese He ma de 17 more
passes than catchese Thore were only four mon on the squad that took fewer shots
per minute. The data show that this player handlod the ball many times for a low
error rate of 1¢870. He was second on the squad in evaluation points per minute
and that shows he did not shoot too often. On playing efficiency hewas the best
center on the squad, and the players, the coach and the freshmen all rated him as
the number four mone

Player E, Forwards

 

This player was a forward and had 14145 minutes of playing time to his cercedite
He earned 560 evaluation points and 25 score pointse He scored 10 goals (303%) and
made 5 free throws (714%). In ball handling he had an error rate of 4.6 which was
second highest on the squad. From the standpoint of player efficiency he ws 12the
There was only one other player on the squad that had a lower rate of personal
foulse Playor E played 141.5 minutes or over 35 games of 40 minutes cach and mado
only 3 personal foulse He is the first player in the list to catch the ball more
than he passed it by 4 catches. He also is the first man on the list to be listed
as a forward onlye Player B played both forward and conter during the season. It
scoms to be a characteristic of the forward position to demand more catching than
passinge The data indicate a low personal foul rate, a poor efficiency rating as
compared to the players who played 200 minutes and an error rate in ball handling
4 times as high as that of players A and G He was rated as sixth by his fellow
players and the freshmen, and seventh by the coacthe

Playor Fe Forwarde

This player was listed as a forward «and he played 117 minutes, making 12 goals
(17.9%), and 8 free throws (571%) He carned 628 evaluation points and 32 score
points. On the player cfficiency chart he rated 6th with o pereontage of 94ele His
rate of error in M11 handling was 2.070, which placed him in fifth place. Like the
preceding player, he had more catches than passes in ball handlinge Only one other
player (H) had more attempted shots por minute of play and only two squad members
made a smaller percentage of their shots. On balls recovered off his own backboard
he rates as the mmbor one mane This is also truc for the recovory of his tcan-
mate's jump ballse On the basis of personal fouls por mimute, this player ranked
12 th for the squad, only two making more than he did. The data indicate that the
player was fairly efficicnt, but that his shooting average was far too lowe He
makes a first class man on handling rebounds off his owm backboard anf getting tho
ball after a tearmato’s jump, but he committee too mony personal foulse His tcan-
mates, freshmen and coach rated him fifthe

Player G. Forward and Grarde

 

This playor was listed as both a forvard and ‘9, guard. He played 100 minutes,
made 460 evaluation points and 10 score points, 4 gonls (20.0%), and shot 2 frec
throws for 50.0%. Ho carned a rating on player efficioncy of 9422%, which places