ee

control over its activities except in so far as it has become the practice of

the Athletic Board to delegate the choice of faculty members to the Senate.

3. There appears to be considerable evidence that provision for student
physical recre ‘ot other than intercollegiate athletics is inadequate in com-
parison wih one institutions. This inadequacy seems to be the result of

numerous factors, including insufficient funds, inadequate equipment, and in-

sufficient personnel.

4, No definite information is available as to the actual number of students
served by the present intramural program, but it is highiy probable that not
more than Pitty percent of the total student body is served by such programs
and that disparity exists in respect to the proportion of students in organized
fraternities and those not so organized who are involved; also there supdars to
-be a disparity in banpent to the number of men as compared to the number of

women served.

5. The intramural and general whysical recreation program as now existent
seems to have no recognized sponsoring body. It is at present carried on by the
Department of Physical Education, whose principal recognized obligation is the

pnysical education curriculum in ali its phases.

6. There is, in fact, an almost complete separation between competitive
athletics and the physical education activities and physical recreation activities.
The personnel concerned with the former is almost, though not completely, separate
from the latter two, and the administrative machinery of the former almost com-
pletely divorced from the latter two. In effect the competitive athletics are
carried on and financed by a idedietaen outside the University, though theor-
etically responsible to the faculty according to the regulations of the confer-

ence to which we belong (see quotation above).