‘LATE RESEARCHES IN BASKETBALL by Dre Forrest C. Allen, Director of Physical Education, Varsity Basketball Coach, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansase (Presented to the Men's Athletic Section of the American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation at their national meeting in San Francisco, California, April 3-6, 1939.) ea er For years the generally accepted method of choosing a team has been upon the judgment of the coach, reinforced by the performance of stellar players who were outstanding in scoring field goals on the offense and by superior guards smothering the scoring oppositione Many times a coach removes a player from the game merely on the coach's own judgment. By the same token other players do not get an opportunity to play because this particular individual did not attract the coach's attention. Baseball has had its batting and fielding averages computed for years, thereby making it easy to weigh the ability of the dominant players in this sport. Using the same procedure in basketball, it is the opinion of the speaker that .g relative rating of basketball players can be hade We call this the "batting and fielding averages" because this terminology elicits the interest of these competing players on account of their previous experiences in bascballe Most every able-bodied boy in America has played either hard ball or soft ball. ~Lthink this is also true in basketball. The problem was to link up the intere est of these boys and get them to enter into a scheme that indicated their prowesses definitely in basketball as has been done in baseball. | The development of a list of offensive elements was the first stepe With that idea in mind a list of offensive elements was made and oach activity or play was weighed subjectively. The woight of the item was carcfully consider- ed ag it related to an important part of offonsive tactics and also insofar 4s jotiteibatod to tho cxocution of sound fundamentals and to winning success. Of course, the objective was to stimulate the learner to make as fow mistakes as possible. Experience has shown that it is the repetition of mistakes that de-= feats a player or a team. The same mistake made too many times always proves disastrous e Under the heading, "The Kansas Basketball Evaluation Study", is shown the positive items as opposed to the negative itemse Every play of importance, both in the pesitive and the negative offensive. study, has been weighed in evaluation points. The old kindergarten theory of 2 good reward for a good deed and a poor reward for a bad deed has boen carricd oute In the above offensive study the data were collected by former varsity players well versed in the meaning of these evaluation points, by mature majors in the Department of Physical Education, and by some other well qualified student assistants. Twelve men students were used in the collection of facts, six fer