Dre Allen, of Kansas, pointed out that almost everyone forgot that Oswald Tower was the interpreter of the rules, whereupon Dr. Carlson said that since it was brought out "there is a rule book, and an official interpreter whom everybody seems to have forgotten, it will be well to continue with the Committee on Interpretations and Propos¢d Rule Changes." Herbert W. Read, of Kalamazoo State Teachers College& set the keynote for the discussion he was to lead, when he outlined the p ace of the gane and the position of the coache He said that there were , east 30,000 high school teams playing basketball and hundreds of thougands of athletes participating. Heraised various points, the suggestion ®;: whether basketball would do best if it were speedier, sh be considered, do the boys prefer a game of speed to ski spirit of the game itself. Does the gane enhance loyalt and school spirit? # enthusiasn ir. Read said that from his questionnaire, it was fofind the coaches liked the four-tine outs, and also the new communication Fule.e The suggestion of a l2~foot radius around the centre circle brought coment from the floore The suggestion of raising the basket to $2 feet fron the floor brought nore discussione The question was whether ft tended to aid or hamper the style of the smaller (or bigger) fellowe Spme declare that the players were becoming smaller and wiser -— other coaches averred that they were becoming taller. The suggestion about a smallef backboard was unfavorably received, in Mr. Read's polle The ten-secon@ rule was uini~ nized in importance. The zone defense and face guarding brought much dischssion, The question of elininating them was offered, although many sbw no harn in the zone defensee lire Read gave his impressions of the ious inter- pretations of face guarding, as viewed in the East and West, where-upon Nat Holnan added that despite the criticisn hurled upon the coaches in the New York City area, the coaches in that vicinity weref most eager to see a unifornity of interpretation and willing to abide whatever decision reached by the rules comittee, _gohn Bunn pointed out four view fron the rule book on block, or screcning, and then called upon everyone to think seriously on that point for the neeting on the morrow. He added that, in Stanforf's recent trip to the East, "three-fourths of the offense had to be disckhrded to oblivi~ ate any officiating difficulty. ‘The officiating was good, commendable, " he said. lire Read declared that a re-survey showed that the epaohte were in favor cf freeing the foul circle fron the foul line out, pnd Oswald Tower added that the rules committee, in his belicf, would look favorably upon any suggestion acceptable to the najority of the coaches! association. Chandler suggested a rule which would allow a tean, foulefl in the closing ninutes, to have the option of taking the ball out of pounds, rather than shooting the foul, The talk on the possible elimination of the centre jump had John J. Gallagher, of Niagara University, say that players and sports writers in Buffalo, N.Y., found it resembling hockey and unsatisfactbry,. Cy Young, of Southern California, added that the clinination would tire the players to the point where substitutions were to be profuse... Mre; Norgrin, who spoke on how the elimination of the tap was received in his section; Rev. Coyne, of Columbia Univorsity, Dubuque, Ia., said that the elinination was whole-heartedly approved in his section; and, Harold Olsen said -that the players in his gane found they were no nore fatigued with the elinina~ tion, than fornerly. ro)