Pacific Coast Conference, Southern Division, for the current season is
given below,each of the teams of the Division playing in at least four
of the games noted. In all of the games the visiting team is desig-
nated "A", the home team "B":

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OFF.
GAME | TEAM | SCORE| SHOTS |F.G.| Pc. | Z1] Z2| Z3 | Wr. | EFF.
7 A 24 57 B | 1460): Ob. 36) 22-4 137 116
B 35 49 12 | .241/ 13]. 25] 11 | 100 | 24
2 A 38 64 15 | .235] 10} 44] 1o | 128 | 30
B 26 58 6 | .103] 12]; 32] 14 | 114 | 12
3 A 39 87 16 | .184] 27| 39] 21 | 180 | 33
B 34 68 13 | s391' 3S} 3s }.-S2-) 1ar fel
4 A 27 57 43 | 3305) 51-38 bio 1200 "| 19
B 34 81 14 | .173| 13] 46] 22 | 153 | 26
5 A 32 67 to | ci Si. B4-| 20-107 119
B 38 56 13 | ,26e) 12l- -S3-| 330 135-1 26
6 A 52 66 24 | .364] 21] 41 41149 | 54
B 22 66 6 | .091| 13] 37] 16 | 129 | 12
W god A 39 82 16 | .195} 13] 40] 29 | 148 | 28.8
B 37 58 14 | 244) 167 =32 | 13-1 191 | 28.1
8 A 21 69 8 Fis a5! 187-35 T 138 ft 4
B 38 54 17 | 3151 201 241 10 |-4i8 | 37
9 A 22 62 & | eo S| ae 38 7 ie 7 14
B 55 58 23 | .397| 16] 38 4] 128 | 51
10 A 28 70 9 | .188| 211% 18 | 31 1 130 | 17
B 33 50 13 1.286! 15) 18 |. is 95 | 25
ia A 16 70 6 | .086/ 10] 30] 30 | 120 | io
B 35 63 15 | .238| 9! 25] 29] 106 | 25
12 A 33 (42 11 |.262] 8] 28 6 86 | 23
B 43 52 16 | .308| 18] 29 5 | 117 | 36

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* Overtime, 55-35 at end of regular playing time.

A study of the foregoing table will show that the offens-
ive effeciency in units approximates twice the number of field goals
or, in other words, the number of points per game score by field
goals, In games 1 and 2 it will be noted the relation is exact in
each case, ignoring decimals. This but serves to emphasize the ne-
cessity for a correlation between the weights and percentages, for
further analysis will show that neither of these elements taken :alone
in comparison between the two contestants in. any given game affords an
accurate criterion of the resnective offensive efficiencies of the two
ovnonents, This is further illustrated below by the appended data
showing, among other things, the won and lost record of tpe high per-
centages and weights. In addition to this, a brief resume of the 12
contests may be of further interest.

Games 1 and 2 were between the same two teams. B won the
first night with high percentage and low weight. A won the second
night, being high in both percentage and weight. Game 3 was won by &
with low percentage but an overwhelming weight advantage (180-111).

Ganes 4 and 5 were between the same two teams, B winning
both games, On the first night the winner was 20 points low in ver-
centage but 53 high in weight. On the second night tne winner was
high in both percentage and weight by margins of 53 in the former and
but 6 in the latter. Yet in both games the correlated offensive ef-
ficiency was the same, namely 26 - 1. In other words, B displayed