STATE TEACHERS COLLEGES. eee COMMITTEE CONTROL OF ATHLETICS. TABLE 9. Function. Institution Fac. Stud. Alumni Tras. Others Total Advisory or Administrative Pe abe is i Bil ise ea 3 3 0 0 0 6 Adm. Sanca -Daroara, \Cals 2c oe: 2 4 0 0 0 7 Adv. pn con, (010, ee eS 2 0 0 0 0 2 Adv. Canpondale, TU. po ec 3 0 0 0 0 3 Adv. Charleston. 25 ee Fe ee 3 2 0 0 0 5 Adm. COR Ee neces ee ee a 3 8 07 0 0 11 Adv. INO male T lise oe Eee a 9 5 0 0 0 14 Adv. Muncie, Ind. = 3 0 0 0 0 3 Adm. Werre Hate; 21nd. se 4 0 0 0 0 4 Adv. Hays, Kan. = 9 0 0 0 0 9 Adv. Bowhne Green, . Ky... 2. 7 0 0 0 0 7 Adm. ies aaZ00 MGn ee ee 3 5 0 0 0- 8 Adv. Marcuette, Miche 2. i000 6 0 0 0 0 6 Adv. Renee, WICR. §. po 3 0 0 0 0 3 Adm. NEO ORHGAG eo VMN oes 4 1 0 0 0 5 Adv. Hachics pure. Miss.) 2280. Me = 0 0 0 0 . Ady. Cape Girardeau, Mo. ........+.___- 5 0 0 0 0 5 Adv. VCS LO as Fo 7 2 0 0 0 9 Adm. SUN ONO ee a s 4 0 0 0 e Adm. PY to ic i - = 0 0 0 * Adm. Ort ade Ne ee 1 10 0 0 0 11 Adv. Dak ee 5 0 0 0 0 5 Adv. Valley City N. Dak. 4.0 4 3 0 0 0 7 Adv. rae OS ae ie 8 0 0 0 0 8 Adv. Indiana, Pa. Lacs re 0 0 0 0 12 Adv. Buppery Rok, Paes 5 0 0 0 0 5 Adm. Mrusfreesboro,. Tenn. 22.220 e 4 0 0 0 0 4 Adv. Canyon. Tbk. coe neh tee x 0 0 0 0 Ls Adv. Ban Marete. Tex 8 5 0 0 0 0 5 Adv. Sellineham: Wash... 3 0 * 0 0 0. * Adm. Pemiont, We VO No Committee Pe Clare Wis. 22 No Committee Mriweukec, Wis. . ©2222 4 6 0 0 0 10 Adv. ea 5 6 0 0 0 al: Adv. Total—34 133 59 0 0 0 170 Adv. 22 Adm. 12 The committees above control or administer the affairs of intercol- legiate athletics, and do not refer to special committees for eligibility of players. A number of institutions had a separate committee for this pur- pose. The purpose of the committees varied somewhat in the institutions. But as a general rule the function which they performed were given as: finance-making of schedules, player awards, making the athletic policy of the institution, securing coaches, etc. Whether the committee was administrative or advisory gives some idea of the use of the committee. In a few cases where the function of the committee was not stated, the writer used his judgment from the facts given to determine whether the committee was administrative or advisory in function.