Chairman, L. W. St. JoHN Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Treasurer, A, E. MetzporF 97 Elmsdorf Ave., Rochester, N. Y. Secretary, GeorcE T. HEPBRON 105 Nassau Street, New York City Vice-Chairman, Froyp A. RowE Board of Education, Cleveland, Ohio NATIONAL BASKETBALL COMMITTEE of the UNITED STATES AND CANADA ANNUAL QUESTIONNAIRE / This questionnaire is sent annually to representative basketball men of the country in order that their views may be es presented at the annual meeting of the National Committee. The Committee will be grateful if you will check these Dr e FF * CG e Al len answers and RETURN THE QUESTIONNAIRE PROMPTLY to Rep. of Sth District, The Committee Member whose name appears above will send all replies received up to March 25 to H. V. Porter, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 11 South LaSalle St., Chicago, Illinois. 1. (a) Has the new note on held ball resulted in a better e? OBE & No (b) Should a held ball be declared whenever a player in control is touching the floor with any part of his body other — or feet? Yes No A (c) when a team is attempting to consume time by holding the ball near the division line should a held ball be declared whenever a closely guarded player holds the ball for three seconds? fy Yes__ No. : 2. Player in possession near the sideline sometimes in- tentionally hits the opponent on the leg with the ball so that it caroms out-of-bounds. There are other similar situations. Should these be regarded as legitimate plays and allowed without penalty? Yes. sf No 3. Check the court size which you regard as best: (a) For high school play 48x75 X48x84 50x94 (b) For college play 48x75 48x84 50x94 4, (a) Has the removal of the “due allowance” clause in the traveling rule caused any difficulty? Yes. No (b) It is claimed that few players in starting a dribble drop the ball before the pivot foot leaves the floor. Do you favor yee nforcement of this SSuctelid Pa — u oT. ie Gee i time out Lt wo each Ae Yes_y 6. The new ey for starting second and fourth quar- ters reduces the number of center jumps. Would you favor further — reduction? Yes. No , This questionnaire checked in cog fr Aneto. 7. Would you favor allowing play to proceed at the end of a quarter until the play which is in progress when the signal sounds is completed? Yes. No FS 8. There is some sentiment in favor of moving the backboards 6 feet inside the end lines. Assuming that over a period of years such a change might be made, in your opinion (a) Would it relieve the crowding in front of the basket? ar as No (b) Would it result in fewer out-of-bounds balls? ] y Yes. No (c) would it result in more play in the center floor f zone and in more "7 from there? Yes, No, (d) Would the increased possibilities for offensive strategy be desirable? - luke . Would you favor a plan ea a free throw for a personal foul would be made from the spot where the foul is committed (with proper adjustments for unusually long or short distances) ? Yes No 7 List other suggestions on reverse side. Hk / Mork ehave ee QUESTIONNAIRE\COMMITTEE, J. H. Crocker, ’ EB; J, Piekox, A, A. SCHABINGER, F, A. ScHMInt, OswaLp Tower, BV) Porter, Chairman ht B, eee ed 7