Se

The group above 90% consisted of 13 playerss the two highost in this
group were forwards. Three centers and cight guards composed the remaindér of the
liste The next group consisted of 22 players, four of whom were centers, seven
were guards, and eleven were forvardse The group below 80% contained eleven
players, three centers, four forwards and four guardse

It should be pointed out that out of the high cight players from the
standpoint of playing officiency, four of these players belong to School D, and
that the players ranked one and two in evaluation points carned per minute also
were from the some toam. Also, it should be noted that two players of School D
were ranked among those that were listed with zero ball handling crrorse

On the basis of the data presented in Table V it would be intcresting
to sclect an all-opposition team,

Sumary and Conclusion.

 

Research of this type depends to a great extent upon the accuracy of
the observerse Realizing this, the observers were very carcfully solected from
student majors and other intcrested studentse Tho same observers were usod in all
the games and there is every roason to believe that the results are very nearly
correcte

It is the opinion of the writers that this study has merit because:

1. It points out mistakes made during a game, thus causing the players to
be more conscious of there

2e It stresses the importance of game fundanentalse
Se It provides an itemized history of the contest,

4. It makes possible a more accurate means of comparing individuals ond teams.e