be

backboards = Kansas securing 78 while tho visitors were collecting 40 reboundse The
recovery of rebounds seems to be the most outstanding difference in the teamse
; , :

The ball handling of the teams shows that Kansas caught and passed 2041
times and the opponents 1092 timese This difference could be ontirely due to various
styles of playe However, when one considers the errors in ball hindling, such as
wild passes, fumbles and held balls obtained by opponents, we see that Kansas made
55 errors and the opponents mado 57 orrors in ball handling. While the number of
errors remained about the same, it should be pointed out that the opponent's ball
handling error rate (4e9%) was almost twice that of the hame team (266%).

In considering the total negative evaluation points, both Kansas and the
opposition made about the same number of mistakes (237 for Kansas and 244 for the
visitors). However, Kansas earned 3327 positive evaluation points as compared to
1997 positive evaluation points earned by the opponents. When these figures are re-
duced to playing efficiency, we find that the home team has a playing efficiency of
934% as compared with 89.1%.

The data show that for each score point the visitors earnod 17.2 evaluation
points and Kansas earned 22.2 evaluation pointse By deducting the 5 evalua tion
points for each score point one seos that 12.2 evaluation points were carned.as come
pared with 17.2 for Kansas. While Kansas had the ball earning the extra evaluation
points it is certain that the opposition was not scoringe However, as pointed out
previously, the various styles of play my effect the total number of evaluation |
points, but the style should not have a great deal of effect on errors in ball hand-
linge

In making direct comparisons between specific teams, 8 summary table made
up from the evaluation summaries shows much the same facts as the totals botweon
Kansas and the oppositione

 

 

 

TABIE IV.
Summary from Evaluation Chart:
; |
a >» | -= oR
as a
soo WS 6B oS 9
2 ¥.¥ i s. f ae es:
- aah i-€& 2 O25 ks sh aN
cs “ = “Son is ONS
ee ee a as as Ss oc Ls
® WY) om ~ S Sa "8 Q. xy UO
‘s eS “se oy - os sy o~ 32 x2
im 3 3
o 2 wo Fs ot © ASE es use oe
ron «CURE BH DHSS QO Clas
mene = =«40 iT oO Uk 7 ie) ~«(le. Gee Cg OO Ce
Selieolh A SS 72 16 9 66 1G 6 6 CBee
Mees. 86 16 86 0S «8tlCUClC tt Cte Oe OSs
Geheol B SS 18 26 S$ GO 8 26 S26 TA 24 6646
Kansas 56 25 31 10 63 9 10 680 1e4 66 96.6
fete 0 oO i Sl 1S «(18 OSE. 868+ 20 = 89,2