9e

In this tabulation of the percentage of goals made (see Table VI), one
can see that player C and player M have both the same score, 353%. However, play~
er C was the most valuable on the basis of other items. Player A with 32.6% is
undoubtedly more valuable than either. This method must be tempered with judgmente
In order to arrive at an index number for rating scoring ability an arbitrary for-
mula was used (see definition of terms, Nos 7)» This gives a rather high index
number which when reduced to a one=two-three basis rating gives a logical ordere

Errors in ball handling include the total number of wild passes, fumbles,
and held balls obtained by an opponente In order to arrive at a ball handling error
rate, the total number of passes and catches was assumed to be an accurate index as
to the relative number of times chances for errors were presente By using the for=
mula given in definition of terms, Noe 8, an index was established. The guards
handled the ball more often than did the forwards, and the two playors with tho low=
est ball handling error rate (playors A and G) arc guards. However, player G also
played as a forward. -The lowest error rate for a forward was 2,0 for player F's

In order to find further ratings for the purpose of analysis, the scores
fran the cvaluation chart were computed on a point per minute basis anda rating
from 1 to 13 given the various players. Tho material in this chart (Table VII) is
of value until one reaches the playors with only a fow minutes of playing timee
Here the chart breaks down: because these players did not perform all of the items
mentioned, and are rated too highly. This mtcrial is discussed somewhat in the
summaries dealing with the individual playcerse

 

 

 

TABLE Vile
Rating on Activitics por Minute* : ai
c © Ss =, | beg
~ ww i ~ i i I
. = -_o 4: Yi a =. = S ™
S ac ce 8 . £ ae &
: A = MAS X
. & a A Areas ee ee i
.% «8 Bee ia §
~ va ye tuk ys = g & ¢ Q. & >
i. oS +. Fe 2G tw ~S
Yow Oo mEq Fo es bh
= ££ 2 eweeS SS at ES OE Ue S CUDP
<- ~~ = 2 os: ~~ 2 2 3 % fy .>
\ -3 a» SRES We SS. 9 BG Se
‘ : : re pe: = ‘ a
ae 2 we eRe tin kak §. BY ey a
> 2 = 65 © SO stv SBS SS v= & B@ ~~
m— 8 os ©. FP Lessee 2S .e 2 3.3 3 ,
Ye ry OUP SIGe GI5H GEE S
7 2 ££ 2 ew nan ee lh hmeDUlUmDmlmD”DUhlUDDUCUUCUCUECCULUm UCD
B ; e 8 5 3 5 2 8 7 10 9 9 6 Yan" 9
C g 3 7 S id 7 4s i 13 ag 4, 7 4 6 3)
D CG 4 2 7 9.10 3 LO 9 9 3 2 9 3 3
gE. Ff S ie 6 Ss: FF 9 “ Se ke Le 7. 925 10
F f 6 4 3 a 2a 6 7 1 i 10 10 5 5 6
G f.6: 9 Fete 10 ae 7 2 12 3 7 8 2 4 o
ee 8 9 1 5 8 4 Le 10 4 13 13 12 8 7
2 z > wa 4 8 s 9 3 2 7 ls 11 3 7 8
7:2 a OS $e5° 1265-6 3 a2 . 1 13 12 Le
K ©6353 GS ae Ae 7 ae 8 6 2 4.5 10° 2 4
L g as hae Ue ae Bed «5 § 6 5 8 6 ia ae 13
x 6 13 5 9 a. a : ee 5 13 6 4.5 8 13 11

*A ranking of 1 is the best performance.