LATE RESEARCHES IN BASKETBALL

by

z Dre Forrest Ce Allen,
~~" Director of Physical Education,
Varsity Basketball Coach,
University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansase

(Presented to the Men's Athletic Section of the American Association for
Health, Physical Education and Recreation at their national meeting in
San Francisco, California, April 3-6, 1939.)

For years the generally accepted method of choosing a team has been
upon the judgment of the coach, reinforced by the performance of stellar players
who were outstanding in scoring field goals on the offense and by superior guards
smothering the scoring oppositione Many times a coach removes a player from the
game merely on the coach's own judgnent. By the same token other players do not
get an opportunity to play because this particular individual did not attract the
coachts attention.

Baseball has had its batting and fielding averages computed for years,
thereby making it easy to weigh the ability of the dominant players in this
sport. Using the same procedure in basketball, it is the opinion of the speaker

that g relative rating of basketball players can be hade We call this the
"batting and fielding averages" because this terminology elicits the interest of
these competing players on account of their previous experiences in baseball.
Most every able-bodied boy in America has played eithor hard ball or soft ball.

~Lthink this is also true in basketball. The problem was to link up the intere
est of these boys and get them to enter into a scheme that indicated their
prowesses definitely in basketball as has been done in baseballe

The development of a list of offensive clomonts was the first stope
With that idea in mind a list of offensive clements was made and oach activity
or play was weighed subjectively. The woight of the item was carcfully consider=
ed ag it related to an important part of .ffonsive tactics and also insofar as
it gouitesbatod to the cxccution of sound fundamontals and to winning success. Of
course, the objective was to stimulato the lcarncr to make as few mistakes as
possible. Experience has shown that it is the repetition of mistakes that de#
feats a player or a teame The same mistake made too many timos always proves
disastrous e

 

 

 

 

Under the heading, "The Kansas Basketball Evaluation Study", is shown
the positive items as opposed to the negative items. Every play of importance,
both in the pesitive and the negative offensive study, has been weighed in
evaluation points. The old kindergarten theory of a good reward for a good deed
and & poor reward for a bad deed has been carricd oute

In the above offensive study the data were collected by former varsity
players well versed in the meaning of these evaluation points, by mature majors
in the Department of Physical Education, and by some othor well qualified student
assistants. Twelve men students were used in the collection of facts, six for

Sek ELS RR Ae aa,