monetary consideration. I am sida alas to "a 5

 

and his kind, as, i am certain, most dollege doaches aie. .
I am irrevocably against professionalism of this sort dr
any other in college athletics?

But if subsidizing means "to furrlish aid with 4

 

 

subsidy," or to give the athlete an ne break) with
other students, them my answer is Yes!} And Rot?
Today is the age of subsidizing. | Presid Zz. Bs
Ciniatd, of Harvard University, stated recently that :
Harvard would subsidise the best young] brains pf the
United States at his institution. Stufierts preparing

for law, medicine, engineering, the a . all
through

 

of the professions have been and are spbsidi
scholarships and fellowships. Why exclude physical edu-
cation and athletics? "Without discrimination] for or
against the athlete" has long been the| slogan of the

present purity collegiate eligibility rules copmittee.
There has been much talk but little action to rénge-thite

shift tho eel into q = “oO

Byron "Whizzer" White, superb football Sayer from

 

\Colerado, is to be subsidized in Englahd with 4 Rhodes
Scholarship. Yet if the English practice of subsidizing
IRhodes Scholars were applied to our Amébrican college

athletes, all efewe-beys would be declared in¢ligible

by our own eligibility committees. Ong of the|/require+

.

ments of the Rhodes Scholarship is,in fact, that the ap
plicabobe outstanding in at least one|sport. | English
jeducation, in other words, encourages jhysical|skill,

oo ippebeonteey American education logks upon|that kind
bf skill with suspicion.

 

 

 

 

10 on 11 8 on9 11 on 12
13% 13% 20