result have confined their efforts to those projects which individual members can support without bringing the club into the picture, This tendency became so prevalent that it became necessary to amend the resolution to make it clearer that Rotary clubs are not pro- hibited from engaging in service activ- ities as a club. As a result of this amendment (1936) three ds a developed: โ€” a) Many Rotarians still maintain that all Rotary activity should be by in- dividual Rotarians and that the club should merely be a source of informa- tion and encouragement and inspiration, b) Many Rotarians just as sincerely be- lieve that there is value: in collec- tive action in Rotary, that Rotary clubs should do some things in a body. c) A third group believes in harmoniz- - ing the two ideas so that every Ro- tarian will continue to feel his indi- vidual responsibility to be of some service in his community, and at the same time some things will be done by the club as a whole or directed by the board or committees of the club, so that the members my feel that they ยป are doing something worth. while as | a group. At the present time sat three SiscSilires are in operation, Each club must de- cide for itself whether one plan should be advocated in preference to another. CHOOSING THE PROCEDURE In deciding what procedure is to be followed with regard to a proposed ac- tivity, the Rotary club may wish to take into consideration wees such as the following: 1) Can the activity be saa duende as vocational service, international serv- ice, or community service? 2):Does the activity involve the pass- -ing and publishing of a resolution? If So, and such a resolution does not con- โ€˜ form to the general opinion of the From Secretariat - Central Office - Rotary International - (File 602B) - Page 3 community, will its adoption jeopardize the local standing of club members? -Are the club members prepared to stand up to any criticism which my result? 3) Will the resolution be passed unan- imously by the club? Will there. be a dissatisfied minority? 4) Is a club resolution the most ef- fective means of action, or can inde- pendent action of individual Rotarians accomplish more? 5) Would a combination of individual. and club action be desirable? 6) Is there any controversial issue in- volved? If so, will action split the club? 7) Is there any possibility that club action will involve it in politics? 8) Will there be any duplication of the efforts of other local agencies? There are other questions which my also be asked, all depending on the kind of project considered and local conditions in the community. In the following paragraphs are further thoughts which may well be considered before any club project is launched. PROJECTS INVOLVING LEGISLATION Many projects do not involve legisla- tion. On the other hand, the club may become interested in or be appealed to support some cause that requires the enactment of legislation. A club my be asked to support the passage of 4 proposed bill in a state legislature. The measure proposed may be a very โ€” worthy and humanitarian one, which would certainly merit the sympathy of all, and at first thought would seem a raat opportunity. for community service. But when we ask ourselves a few of the questions previously mentioned, we may decide that there are good reasons why individual action is ne es to club ae In this pertigular case, the 5 Rotary (over)