10.

ile

13.
14.
15.
16.

17.

5.

Wild passes: non-conference, 8.5; out of bounds, 2.75; to
an opponent, 5.75

conference, 6.8; out of bounds, 2.6; to an
opponent, 4.2 —

Held balls obtained by opponents: non-conference, 2
conference, 4

Fumbles: non-conference, 6.25; out of bounds, 3.25; obtained

by opponent, 3
conference, 6.0; out of bounds, 3.0; obtained by
epponent, 3

Tapped ball out of bounds: non-conference, 1.25
conference, 1.4

Tapped and recovered own jump ball: non-conference, .5 times
. conference, no times

Recovers teammate's jump ball: non-conference, 13.75
| conference, 8.4

Assists: non-conference, 25.25; immediate, 13.5; secondary, 11.75
conference, 25205 immediate » 12.63; secondary, 10.4

Evaluation points: non-conference, 1132.75 - 69 = 1065.75
conference, 1079.2 < 76.6 = 1002.6

Evaluation points per minute of pk y: non-conference, 26.59
| " conference, 25.07

Evaluation points per score: non-conference, 25.36
conference, 23.22

Pligying efficiency: non-conference, 94.3%
conference, 93.4%

Ball handling error rate: non-conference, 2.2%
conference, 2.

It is interesting to note that the scores are almost

identical and that the number of goals are about the same. However,

in the conference games, the team took 13 less shots per game.

This means that the team's shooting average was considerably better,
being 29.4% for the conference games and 24.4% for the non-conference
games, From the standpoint of ball handling, there were 24 more

passes and 31 more catches per game in the non-conference matches
than in the conference games. Both the playing efficiency and ball