a.

handling error rate were poorer in.the conference games than in
the non-conference games.

= should also be noted that for each game point scored
in the non-conference games, 20.36 evaluation points (25.36 - 5)
were earned by some other method, ‘An analysis of the data shows
that scoring a field goal pleys a reletively small part in scoring
evaluation points, and that ball handling, recovery of vebdeunds, ete.
must be considered to a larger extent. oe |

In the last three games data were obtained on both the
‘ansas team and its opponents, This material is sumerized in the
nneing list.
TABLE itl.

Cent erence Game Records made by Kansas and Opponents

1. ‘Seores: Opponents
Kansas, 1 ie

2. Goals: Opponents took 184 shots, made 39 goals; average %
Kansas took 165 shots, made 56 goa 85 average 5329
4

3. Free throws: Opponents took 44 shots, made 243 a %
| ‘Kansas took 42 shots, made oT, average 64.3

 

4. Personal fouls: Opponents 36
Kansas, 27

5, Of

 

6. Violations: Opponents, 16
eT ey ae

 

%, Rebounds off own backboard: Opponents recovered 45
ar gr aaa jude Kansas recovered 70 |

8. Rebounds off o ent 's a Opponents recovered 40
; —- Kansas recovered 78

9. Good passes and catches: Gepnainate 607 ea passes; 485 catches
Kansas, i043 good passes; 998 catches