8.

seems that the Kanses personal fouls occurred more often when a man
was in the act of shooting than did the fouis of the opponents, by
the rate of 8 to 15. In this case the total is somewhat misleading,
as ‘the discrepancy oecurred almost entively in one game that Kansas -
won by 20 points, The most outstanding difference to be pointea pr
occurred in two places; in the recovery of rebounds and in ball
hendling.

_In the resevery of rebounds, one sees that the Kansas
seit recovered 70 rebounds oft their own backboards, while the
opponents recovered 45 off their backboards. ‘The same ratio holds
when one notes the rebounds of the opponent's backboards - Kansas
securing 78 while the visitors were collecting #0 rebounds, The
recovery of rebounds seems to be the most outstanding difference
in the teams.

: The ball one of the teams shows that Kansas 7
and passed 2041 times and the opponents 1092 times, This difference
could be entirely due to various styles of play. However : when one
considers the errors in ball handling, such as wild passes, fumbles
and held balls obtained by eppensnte., we see that Kansas made 55
errors and the eppenente made 57 errors in ball handling. While the
number of errors remained about the same, it should be pointed out
that the opponent's ball handling error rate (4.9%) was almost twice
that of the home team (2.6%).

In considering the total negative evaluation points, both
Kansas and the opposition made about the same number of mistakes
(287 for Kansas and 244 for the visitors). However, Kansas earned
3527 positive evaluation points as compared to 1997 positive evelua-
tion points earned by the opponents. When these figures are reduced
to playing efficiency, we find that the home tean hes a playing _