m.

of the data gathered.

, The players have been listed (see Table 7, Evel uation |
Point Totals) by the number of minutes played during the home games.
By a brief study of this table one can see that there is a high re-
lationship between minutes played and the total number of evaluation
points. The next column should have more meaning in that points are
considered in relationship to the total number of minutes played.
The column on playing efficiency was arrived at by the formula given
in the definition of terms (No. 6). This rating is probably the most
meaningful in the table, but it does not tell the complete stery.

Ball handling is the basis for offensive ability, and for
this reason a ball handling table has been tabulated (see Table VI).

 

 

TABLE V.
Ratings Based on Evaluation Point Totals.
Player Minutes* Eval. Points Points per Player efficiency
! Earned Minute Percentage
A 328.5 =. 2098 ; 6.36 9725
B 266 1307 4.9} 92.2
¢ 263.5 1300 4.93 96.4
D 221.5 1256 5.67 94.9
E 141.5 560 3.96 | — —- 9065
F 117 628 557 94.1
G 100 460 4.60 94.2
H 74.5 344 4.62 93.0
I 70.5 310 4.39 , 91.7
a 70.0 395 5-64 91.6
K 59.5 297 4.99 94.5
L 34.5 120 3248 84.5
M 22.5 117 5.22 91.5

“Time as recorded by W. A. Dill, compiled or on Dill method of
playing time yaeertings |