12.

 

     

 

  

 

TABLE VI.
. Ball Handling
; Goal Shooting | Passing and Catehing
a fe 2 22 4 “i
* 4 a a
o we 8 : s< s pets s
ot a rie
® 3 Sh ee é eo get
> a Bel AD t1 © @ : ei Saf "
: 2 92 ga od eu & 83 ES Ss 4
A & i é 29 .& +3 D9 of eT. 16 : , / ee
8 £48 & 27-1 20 66.7 845 26 2.9 7
cc $$ B.. Bes 5 71.4 1004 17) sole? 3
a 10 3025 5 71.4 372 18 4.6 iz.
y-8 wf 12 17.9 8 57.1 341 7 2.0 5
@ f,¢% 4 9.0 2 50.0 348 § 4618 1
= ££ | 13 30.2 4 66.7 166 il 6.2 13
. £ @ 7 21.2 2 335.5 192 os 4.0 il
7 ¢. 3 16.7 2 40,0 346 il Sel ss
2 g 13 = = 116 4 3.3 9
M 12 1 53505 2 66.7. 85 3 34 10

# guard, forward, center.

In. this tabulation of the percentage of goals made (see
Table VI), one.cm see that player C and player M have both the same
score, SS eFhe However, player C was the most valuable on the basis
of other items. Player A with 32.6% 1s undoubtedly more aa: le

 

than either. ‘This method must be tempered with judgment. In. order
to arrive at an index number for rating scoring ability an arbitrary
formula was used (see definition of terms, No. 7). This gives a
rather high index number which when reduced to a one-twoethree basis —
rating gives a logical. order.

Errors in ball handling include the total number of wild
passes, fumbles, and held balls obtained by an opponent. In order
to arrive at a ball handling error vate, the total number of passes
and catches was assumed to be an accurate index as to the relative —

eet