13.

number of times chances for errors were present. By using the
formula given in definition of terms, No. 8, an indes was established,
The guards handled the ball more often than did the forwards, and

the two players with the lowest ball handling error rate (players

A and G) are guards. However , player G also played as a forward,

‘The lowest error rate for a forward was 2,0 for player F. |
3 In order to find further ratings for the purpose of
analysis, the scores from the evaluation chart were computed on a
point per minute basis and a rating from 1 bal 13 given the various
pleyers. The material in this chart ( Table. VII) is of value until

a

one reaches the players with only a few minutes of playing time.
Here the chart breaks down because these players did not perform all

: of the items mentioned, and are rated too highly, This material is

dteqenesd somewhat in the summaries dealing with the individual

 

 

players.
TABLE VII.
Rating on Act vite eR Minute* +i
Z 3c a g ° : é 5 E +. ho .
ge Sab baad Fenbc ds qasaea > Ss
ih og 3a8 bide aa oR CSE baa aa se ° 8a 3
mH © th Chek @ fe iO het Mh SERUEUE aesu 3
S 38 £28 ZAS8 FRGSRGER SARZAZA BETS so
ee ee ee ee ee 2 fx oS =a w
oe a 2s Sh ae eee ger a ir as eS ie he Se CE
ake 2 & fF & F 8 7 10 #8¢§  & 6&6 869
S.6::3. 3%. 4.23% ..9 2. :'.% 13 S -@€°.2.°-@: € 8:
rp é€é&¢ FF Fe hUve!lUD 9 > @& 2 Ff 2 =
2 .f.542@ @ § § 22:9 & 8 11 12 -7 . 965 10
- ££ €.4¢ 3 6 Be OS 7 1 2 WwW ££ & SS
G £6730 11 10 33 .7..,3 12 Ss F¥ @ © 2 F
re. a2 & @& ££ ee 10 4 i838 i3.38 68 fT
+t £m 42 OB: §-8 3° 2 . 7 Wii & 7 &
J £10 310 7 3.5 18.5 6 3 mifet 2? «as hlUwe
K esi O28 32%. 7 3h. oh 8 6 82 4510.8 4
L 121313 13 3.5 12.5 §& 6 & &@ €& hs OM
uM a .8£08 13 28-2. 2: &. ww 6 46 6 23 @&
# A panking of 1 is the best performance.