18. -

his player was a forward and had 141.5 minutes of play-
ing time to his credit. He earned 560 evaluation points and 25
score points. He scored 10 goals (50.3%) and made 5 free throws
(71.4%). In ball handling he had an error rate of 4.6 which was
second highest on the squad. From the standpoint of player effic-
iency he was twelfth. There was only one ott player on the squad
that hed a lower rate of personal fouls. Player E played 141.5
minutes er over 33 games of 40 minutes each and made only 3 personal
fouls. He is the first player in the list to catch the ball more
then he passed {t by 4 catches. He also is the first man on the
list to — listed as a forward only. Player B played both forward
and center during the season. It seems to be a characteristic of
the forward position to demand more catching than passing. The date
indicate a low personal foul rate, a poor efficiency rating as com-
pared .to the players who played 200 minutes and an error rate in
ball handling 4 times as high as that of players A and G. He was
rated as sixth by his fellow players and the freshmen, and seventh
by the coach.
Player F. Forward

This player was listed as a forwerd und he played 117

minutes, making 12 goals (17.9%), and 8 free throws (57.1%). He
earned 628 evaluation points and 52 score points. On the player
efficiency bhart he rated sixth with a percentage of 94-1. His rate
of error in ball handling was 2.070, which placed him in fifth _
place. Like the preceding player, he had more catches than passes
in ball handling. Only one other player (H) had more attempted shots
per mimite of play and only two squed members made a smaller per=
centage of their shots. On balls recovered eff his own backboard