206

made 13 baskets (30.2%) and 4 free throws (66.7%). This player
alse had the highest number of shots attempted per mimte ef play.
On the basis of player efficiency he rated 95.0%. But on his ball
handling ability he had an error rating ef 6.2%, or 5 times that of
players A and G. He was the eighth player on the basis of time
played and he ranked eighth on the basis ef personal fouls, When
it came to passing and catching the ball, he made 22 more catches
than passes » This player was a | good scorer but he shot more than
any other player per minute of play. He made teo many errors in
ball handling and in this department he ranked thirteenth. He
ranked seventh on his playing efficiency, and the players rated him
tenth, the coach eleventh, and the freshmen twelfth.
Player I. Forward. :
7 Player I was in the games for 70.5 mimtes as a forward.

He earned 395 evaluation points and 16 score points, and made 7 goals
for 21.2% and threw 2 fouls for 33.3%. On the basis of personal
fouls per minute he was number one man with less than any other
| member of the squad. He had a ball handling error rating of 4.0%
and a playing efficiency of 91.7%. As a forward he recovered enough
palls from the opponent's backboard per minute to rank as the No. 2
man of the squad. He also was the No. 3 man in recovering the ball

eff his own backboard, and he ranked third on the basis ef tetal
pecevertos per minute. In the amount of playing time this player
ranked ninth and on the basis of playing efficiency he also ranked
ninth. Like the other forwards, he also caught the ball more than
he passed it and ranked third in the attempted geals per minute of
playing time. This player was good at recovering rebounds, not too
good a shot, and among the 3 players to have an error rating over