Se backboards = Kansas securing 78 while the visitors wore collecting 40 reboundse The recovery of rebounds scens to be the most outstanding difference in the teamse The ball handling of the teams shows that Kansas caught and passed 2041 times and the opponents 1092 timese This difference could be entirely due to various styles of playe However, when one considers the orrors in ball hkndling, such as wild passes, fumbles and hold balls obtained by opponents, we see that Kansas made 55 errors and the opponents made 57 orrors in ball handling. While the number of errors remained about the same, it should be pointed out that the opponent's ball handling error rate (409%) was almost twice that of the home team (246%). In considering the total negative evaluation points, both Kansas and the opposition made about the same numbor of mistakes (237 for Kansas and 244 for the visitors). However, Kansas earned 3327 positive evaluation points as compared to 1997 positive evaluation points carned by the opponentse When these figures are re- duced to playing efficiency, we find that tho home toam has a playing efficiency of 93e4% as compared with 89el%e The data show that for each score point the visitors earncod 1722 cvaluation points and Kansas earned 22.62 evaluation pointse By deducting the 5 evalua tion points for each score point one seos that 12.2 evaluation points were carned as com= pared with 17.2 for Kansas, While Kansas had the ball earning the extra evaluation points it is certain that tho opposition was not scoringe However, as pointed out previously, the various styles of play may effect the total number of evaluation points, but the style should not have a great deal of effect on errors in ball hand-~ linge In making direct comparisons between specific teams, a summary table made up from the cvaluation summaries shows much the same facts as the totals between Kansas and the oppositione TABLE IV. Summary from Evaluation Chart: — ~ -3 oO a ¢ =~ “ YW & — o at i= @ —. | = ee SD ' 2a ets ee we 2 _ ™ = OA oy a aN, "2 s 2 Ste 62 &e-¥S ~~ = » x£ “iS q 9 = vs i yo NY . i vw aN ._ &. S's SS 2 CS ou. ae WU 5. - » oe = Fy ~— eS _ 2 & we BE a SSE oo eee a m © Ric Ee ! luk g BR ELA [—-. )6h6UhhhChUhUlU ll CU lh hd heh Uo Ll CU ee ee ee ee ee Kansas 46«s«3H—CiaS:CSCSC? a School B 33 15 29 3 60 a i eee ee ee ee eee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee