Je In this tabulation of the percentage of goals made (see Table VI), one can see that player C and player M have both the same score, 33.3%. However, play- er C was the most valuable on the basis of other itemse Player A with 32.6% is undoubtedly more valuable than either, This method must be tempered with judgmente In order to arrive at an index number for rating scoring ability an arbitrary for- mula was used (see definition of terms, Noe 7)» This gives a rather high index number which when reduced to a one=twoethree basis rating gives a logical ordere Errors in ball handling include the total number of wild passes, fumbles, and held balls obtained by an opponente In order to arrive at a ball handling error rate, the total number of passes and catches was assumed to be an accurate index as to the relative numbor of times chances for errors were presente By using the for- mula given in definition of terms, Noe 8, an index was established, The guards handled the ball more often than did the forwards, and the two players with tho low- est ball handling error rate (playors A and G) are guards. Howevor, player G also played as a forwarde The lowest error rate for a forward was 2.0 for player Fe In order to find further ratings for the purpose of analysis, the scores from the evaluation chart were computed on a point per minute basis and a rating from 1 to 13 given the various players. The material in this chart (Table VII) is of value until one reaches the players with only a fow minutes of playing timee Here the chart breaks down because these players did not perform all of the items mentioned, and are rated too highly. This mtcrial is discussed somewhat in the summaries dealing with the individual playcrse TABLE Vile Rating on Activitics per Minute ° . “ < \ a | "2 | = = ef % ; &! 8 £. S 0 x SeecS €is, & Be & . «= Se se 7. .2s & a ; & SS ye Base GEGE — i. ££ 7 - men be & Fs S§ ° Ss .¢ * Siw OH KS SY sh a . , — oe. S~ ses 9 Ga w«hb © &@2 w« HS OF ef . Se SEs we ESO SSS S SS Sys elsississ 3s 2 BED S mF = © © Lev eeee as fa & | we Ss = Ye AF g_SoueUm sede GIG GUS "+. t+ tetfttfttY i —". c+ +t © Se © ee 8 tk CS 7 ». 8 © ©. oe 8 © & © F 8 hh. 8. we i 13 . @ FY © 6 Ss . ¢ ©£ © 8 oe 8 9 9 s 4 © 8 | et £6 ee Se 8 4 sn uM 8 . © £7 £m 6 YF 1 [we we ££ 8 8 ct, 7 wee we YY 3 12 ee a ee ee . 2: £ et 8 8 A 10 ‘ ww wm € Ff | EE 7. as 8. Le 3 a | =a. i 3 7 8 2f£ wm 8 FY tet Ret C 3 “so + + 2 Hw S sce. 6 eR Ft 8M 8 ‘ £ at & 4 i ss 2M Mw uM 8 tC 6 t 8* £4 un S&S weep in i 8 5 wo 8 466 HH OD *A ranking of 1 is the best performance.