12.

Player De Centcre

 

Player D was the fourth man on the squad to play over 200 minutes with a
total timo of 221.5 minutes, He carned 33 soore points and 1256 cvaluation points,
which was fourth high for the squade While playing he scored 14 goals (#8%) and
made 5 free throws (62.5%)« In ball handling orrors ho had a low score of 149% and
was one of the four mon to score less than 2% crrorsa His all around playing cffi-
cicney was 94.9%, which was also fourth for the squade As far as ball handling was
concerned, he was third in the total number of passes and catchese He ma de 17 more
passes than catchese There were only four men on the squad that took fewer shots
per minute. The data show that this player handled the ball many times for a low
error rate of 12870. He was second on the squad in cvaluation points per minute
and that shows he did not shoot too oftene On playing efficiency hewas the best
center on the squad, and the players, tho coach and the freshmen all rated him as
the number four mone

Player E, Forworde

 

This player was a forward and had 141.5 minutes of playing time to his credite
He earned 560 cvaluation points and 25 score pointse Ho scored 10 goals (30.3%) and
made 5 free throws (71.4%). In ball handling he had an error rate of 4.6 which was
second highest on the squad. From tho standpoint of player cffieicncy he was 12the
There was only one other player on the squad that had a lower rate of personal
foulse Player E played 141.5 minutes or over 35 games of 40 minutes cach and mado
only 3 personal foulse He is the first player in the list to catch the ball more
than he passed it by 4 catches, He also is the first man on the list to be listed
as a forward onlye Player B played both forward and center during the season. It
seems to be a characteristic of the forward position to demand more catching than
passinge The data indicate a low personal foul rate, a poor efficiency rating as
compared to the players who played 200 minutes and an error rate in ball handling
4 times as high as that of players A and G He was rated as sixth by his fellow
players and the froshmen, and soventh by the coache

Player F, Forwarde

 

This playor was listed as a forward and he played 117 minutes, making 12 goals
(17.9%), and 8 free throws (57e1%)e He carned 628 evaluation points and 32 score .
pointse On the player cfficiency chart he rated 6th with a porcontage of 94el.e His
rate of crror in mll handling was 2.070, which vlaced him in fifth place. Like the
preceding player, he had more catches than passes in ball handlinge Only one other
player (H) had more attempted shots por minute of play and only two squad members
made a smaller perecentaze of their shots. On balls recovered off his own backboard
he rates as the number one man, This is also truc for the recovery of his tean-
mote's jump ballse On the basis of personal fouls per minute, this player ranked
12 th for the squad, only two making more than he did,g The data indicate that the
player was fairly cefficicnt, but that his shooting average was far too lowe He
mokes a first class man on handling rebounds off his ovm backboard anf getting the
ball after a tearmato’s jump, but he committee too many personal foulse His tcane-
mates, freshmen ond coach rated hin fifthe

Player G. Forward and Guarde

 

This playor was listed as both a forward nnd a guards He played 100 ninutes,
made 460 evaluation points and 10 score points, 4 goals (20.0%), and shot 2 frec

throws for 50.0%. Ho carned a rating on playor cfficioncy of 942%, which places