Se

The group above 90% consisted of 13 players; the two highest in this
Group were forwards. Three centers and cight guards composed the remaindér of the
liste The next group consisted of 22 players, four of whon were centers, seven
were guards, and eleven were forwards. The group below 80% contained eleven
players, three conters, four forwards and four guards.»

It should be pointed out that out of the high cight players from the
standpoint of playing efficiency, four of these players belong to School D, and
that the players ranked one and two in evaluation points carned per minute also
were from the same team. Also, it should be noted that two players of School D
were ranked among those that were listed with zcro tll handling crrorse

On tho basis of the data presented in Table V it would be interesting
to sclect an all-opposition team,

Summary and Conclusion

Research of this type depends to a great extent upon the accuracy of
the observers. Realizing this, the observors were very carcfully selected from
student majors and other interested studentse Tho sane observers wore usod in all
the games ond there is evory roason to believe that tho results are very nearly
correct.

It is the opinion of the writers that this study has merit because:

le It points out mistakes made during a game, thus causing the players to
be more conscious of theme

ée@ It stresses the importance of gane fundanentals
$e It provides an itemized history of the contest.

4. It makes possible a more accurate neans of conparing individuals and teans »