6
Monday, May 8, 1978
University Daily Kansan
Leaders similar in background
Power . . . leadership . . . influence.
Forces that shape the character and destiny of any community. Those who manage the business or business and industry, by money, by family name—or by a loose coalition of interests that compromise and cooperate to check one another.
Decisions may be made in formal meetings of legally recognized bodies, at cocktail parties or siddun dinners, in the corporate board room or in the VIP section at a football game—wherever leaders get together and discuss their ideas.
In Lawrence, the typical leader is likely to be a man about 50 years old who holds a degree from the University of Kansas. He is a professional who probably serves as an elected officer for at least one governmental or special-interpersonal role. He is a long-time member of the community. He is in a respectable tuxedo bracket. And he is white.
That is a composite view of the leaders who were selected for study and does not represent any particular individual. Indeed, they are not only competent in notable exceptions to this internal average.
TWO WOMEN are among the 20 key influencers and one key influential spends most of his time out of the state. Several of them have lived in Lawrence only a short time.
One of these is Chancellor Archie R. Dykes, who, the study indicates, is perhaps the most influential person in Lawrence. Dykes also is an exception in that he is not a native Kansan, nor was he educated at KU. He is a professional administrator who moved to Lawrence in 1972 when he was appointed to the University of New York, which it is not partisan and he has not become involved in local civic matters during his term as chancellor.
Like Dykes, Buford Watson is a professional whose appointment as city manager brought him to Lawrence several times. He is one of the few men has brought him into the forefront of visible leadership and influence—he did not earn the position by longstanding contacts and relationships.
In most cases, however, developing those loyalities and contacts plays an important role in advancement toward a position that influences others in the community. And the future leader might choose any of several paths to attaining that position.
In the city of Lawrence, the most accepted route to the top begins with a college education, usually in a professional field, or a university degree. Graduate work, also in a professional school. After graduation, the future leader settles down to a role of respectability in the community and bashes himself with hard work to establish a position on to take position of special responsibility.
WITH THE exception of those key influentials who are professional administrators, the future influential probably will be called upon by other community leaders who will urge him to become more actively involved in the affairs of his city. They would also have said they had been urged by their families or associates to take on a leadership role.
Indeed, one of the 29, who affirmed that he had entered civic life because of such action, said, "You don't pick the time when will involve the time. The time picks you."
Power in Lawrence, as interpreted through this project, appears to be formed around issues and interest groups, whose leaders have attained leadership within the community. Because of their achievements, they are called on to assume a wider field of leadership.
And because of this background, none of the key influencers is a maverick, an outsider who is perhaps something of an agitator in behalf of various causes. The 20 are marked by their homogeneity; their similarities, rather than their differences, make them leaders. Their very individuals who have worked their ways respectfully to the top.
FROM THE TOP, the view is benign.
Meet of the key influencers deny that they
are a threat to Google's business.
ture. In interviews with members of the reporting team, the influentials characterized themselves modestly, not as leaders but as representatives of the community. They tended to see themselves as persons who have been granted positions of public trust.
According to those influencers who have been residents of Lawrence for a number of years, they are not often bona fide but have evolved from a much different, older structure. That structure tended to be dominated by a few powerful individuals who were very much in matters of community action.
Those individuals were members of the old Lawrence families, whose influence was backed up by several generations of family influence within the city. Although descendants of some of those families are still among the power elite in the camp today, their names alone are not enough to carry weight in civic controversies.
ALTHOUGH THESE individuals tend to remain in the background, taking no active
part in any discussion of community questions, their influence is nevertheless strong enough to enable them to act as "vetoes" for any proposal they might choose in opposing it. In many cases opponents have chosen not to become involved to any degree in Lawrence activities.
As might be expected, money enters into any discussion of power within the community. Although all those who were named as key influencers fall into one category—that of Lawrence's financial strata and one-Dykes—the highest-paid public administrator in the state, personal wealth does not seem to be a prerequisite for political success. It is, however, that it was a success that is necessary to enter into levels of decision-making in the community.
The list, however, does include a large number of individuals who control the expenditures of businesses and organizations, thereby making economic decisions that affect the lives of others. Some are elected or appointed officials who approve the expenditure of tax funds and
federal appropriations. A demonstrated ability to handle money is apparently a decided asset to success in community leadership.
POWER IN Lawrence, this study seems to indicate, is based on leadership in politics, business, banking or civic affairs, one of the areas of interest and importance within the community. Influence does not center on dominating personal interests, but on persons who fill the offices may change and, in most cases, the influence remains with the position.
This study is not the all-time, definitive look at power in Lawrence. The personalities and persons who hold influence over a community are months—certainly within the next two years.
The structure of power in Lawrence is tern but flexible. It changes frequently, but when it changes, the power increases.
And, although some may be unhappy with the system, it apparently works to the benefit of those who use it.
Lawrence leaders listed
Who really runs Lawrence?
-KANSAN-
There are a number of ways a reporter can study leadership in a community. For a study of Lawrence, a team of 10 reporters chose the reputational approach, a method devised and used by sociologists to study power in communities.
Supplement Spring 1978
Reporters deal with community 'leadership on a day-to-day basis but rarely step back to observe the overall pattern of leadership and power.
THE LIST WAS TAKEN to 10 people who serve as judges. The judges were persons formerly or currently involved in the decision making process in Lawrence and the school district with high positions in state or local government and in the University administration.
This approach relied on consulting people in Lawrence who were familiar with community leaders and decision-making processes. Then the team interviewed those who had been identified as influential leaders.
To begin the project, the reporters gather a list of about 130 potentially disruptive banks, bankers, organization presidents, landowners, lawyers, members of prominent families. University officials, labor and business leaders, and local educators, and cultural leaders.
The judges evaluated each name on the list, identifying each as indispensable, important, helpful, not needed or not recognized.
Scores for each person on the list were averaged and a standard deviation figured. Leaders who averaged more than one score were contacted individually for interviews,
specific influence in Lawrence's power structure. Each also was asked to discuss the important issues facing Lawrence and the community that he be involved in making community decisions.
Those leaders are:
- Marine Arngersinger; city commissioner and former mayor.
- Jack Barr: chairman of the board of Lawrence National Bank.
Each leader was questioned about his
- Bob Billings: president of Alivar Inc. *
* Beverly Bradley: county commissioner
- Barkley Clark: city commissioner and professor of law,
- Archie R. Dykes: chancellor of the University of Kansas;
- Art Heck: farmer and former county commissioner.
Archie Dukes
- John McGrew: Lawrence real estate developer.
- Jack Rose; city commission cr
- Dolph Simons Sr.: editor of the Lawrence Daily Journal-World.
- Dolph Simons Jr. : president and publisher of the Lawyer Daily Journal.*
- John Vogel: state representative.
* Edward Kelly: city manager.
- Peter Whitenight: chairman of the County Commission,
- Odd Williams: businessman and farm manager
- Olin Petiteh: attorney for the Kansas University Endowment Association.
- Larry Winn: U.S. representative.
* Olin Petefish: attorney for the Kansas
- Warren Rhodes: president of the First National Bank
Staff Photo
- Rusty Springer: owner of Rusty's grocery stores.
- Charlie Sough: attorney and former state legislator
Dykes prefers personal approach
Cancellor Archie Dykes, to many people and to himself, is the University of Kansas.
The automatic connection between Dykes and KU has not come about by accident. Dykes conducts a public relations campaign through the key to the campaign's current success.
Dykes said recently that his ability achieve the heas set he had for KU was related directly to his ability to persuade him and state leaders that his ideas were right.
He said that any chancellor's impact on policy-making was based on the personality of the people.
"I don't think the authority of my office makes that much difference," he said. "Most of what is achieved is achieved through a process of persuasion and helping people understand the goals we're trying to achieve. Once people have adequate information, they tend to come to the same decisions."
Dykes' approach to his job is personal. If Dykes makes the right contacts, KU will benefit.
"It is important for the University to be involved with activities outside the university, so that we can also provide opportunity through those kinds of involvement to build support. My participation in the business community makes it easier to raise funds to support the university."
DYKES A IS MEMBER OF the boards of directors of several businesses, including the First National Bank of Kansas City, the Jacksonville Branch of the Merchants National Bank of Topeka.
Involvement in business activity and an interest in the prosperity of the community is one of the best ways to gain support for KU Dykes said.
However, not everyone is happy with the approach Dykes has taken in administering the activities of KU. Since his arrival at KU in 2015, Mr. Dykes has as a demanding employer and an administrator who, at times, pays too much attention to the details of the campus' app
A janitor who works in Strong Hall said
One of Dykes' assistants summed up Dykes approach, saying, "The chancellor certainly is concerned about outward appearances. He thinks that it makes a big impression on determining whether students will come here."
THE ASSISTANT also said that a large portion of the mail received by Dykes mentioned the appearance of the campus. He said that was one reason why Dykes was more conscious of appearances than most of the other KU administrators.
An employee at the Kansas Union said he had seen Dykes checking one of the men's backpacks.
he had been warned that Dykes would make wine glove inspections of the staircase's rails.
"The cancellor is especially interested in areas of special visibility and vulnerability to these threats, the areas where he gets involved because he gets the most heat about these."
"While the deans can be more involved in academic interests and faculty and students, the Chancellor has interest, has the power to regulate its legislation," the Legislature and the Board of Regents. "
One administrator said. "Archie just recesses breath down Burger's neck."
Dykes said that during the legislative session his most important responsibility was to ensure the committee's work.
State Rep. John Vogel, R-Lawrence, said Dykes was an effective spokesman for KU at the Legislature. He said that in the past some chancellors had been better off sending a representative to the Legislature to speak for KU.
"But Chancellor Dykes' character and personal make him a leader in the future."<sup>1</sup>
"FOR THE LAST few years, since I've been associated with the University, the relationship has been very positive and mutually rewarding," Dykes said. "That isn't always true in a community where there is a major university."
Dykes said that the main issue that concerned him in the Lawrence area was sustaining the relationship that existed between Lawrence and KU.
When a problem that concerns both KU
Dykes said that he did not think he was a leader in the Lawrence community unless he was.
and the city comes to his attention, Dykes said, he works through formal channels with the City Commission, the County Comptroller, the Chamber of Commerce and the city manager.
"I don't have extensive active involvement in the community," he said. "It would be impossible, given my time limitations."
Jim Scaly, administrative assistant to the chancellor, said that for every invitation given, he would be satisfied.
Dykes said, "The most frustrating thing is the demands of time and the constraints of time. There's just not enough time. The hardest part of the job is trying to sort out the things one is expected to do with the time of the day.
"But if the chancellor doesn't make certain appearances, Scaally said, 'he gets
"The time element is a very serious problem."
Scally said he thought Dykes worked about 350 days a year.
Scally said that Dykes would never ask another employee of the University to do more than Dykes would do himself. Scally said that Dykes sometimes did not consider that most people would not or could be given a work schedule that was as demanding as his.
An assistant to Dykes said that Dykes was aware of everything that happened on the floor.
"HE DEALS with as much as is humanly possible," he said. "In fact, he makes superhuman efforts to keep informed on what's going on."
Dykes' approach to KU administration has been controversial since he has been working at KU. His demanding attitude and determination for perfection undoubtedly always will be unpopular with some of his associates.
Now, however, most of the people whom Dykes works with on a daily basis will agree that he has taken an effective approach to gaining popular support and money for KU.
And for Archie Dykes, that's what the chancellor's job is all about.