WEDNESDAY, JULY 28, 2004
LAW
THE UNIVERSITY DAILY KANSAN
9
15
IMMIGRANT: Plaintiffs question bill
CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1
three years, and who graduated from a Kansas high school or received a GED from the state, to pay in-state tuition at Kansas universities regardless of residency status.
But, Heath said, his motivation for joining the suit was not based on a particular dislike for immigrants. Rather, Heath wanted to lower his own tuition bill.
"To be honest, I thought that most of all it would be nice to get all of that tuition money back," Heath said. "I don't care too much about the immigrants getting in-state tuition. The kids who qualify have obviously lived here for a while — you can't become fluent in English if you have only been here for three years. But don't make me pay out of state. Make everyone pay the same."
That view somewhat conflicts with the ideology of the organization that spearheaded the suit. Unlike Heath, FAIR vocally denounces the prospect of allowing illegal immigrants to receive any benefits, no matter how long they have been in the United States.
had been brought to the United States as children by their parents.
Susan Tully, FAIR's Midwest field director and one of the lead organizers of the lawsuit, said FAIR wanted to see the law overturned and was not sympathetic to the plight of immigrant students who
"Just because their parents broke the law does not give them the right to think that they can stay here and continue to break the law," Tully said. "They need to go back to their homeland and file the appropriate papers to come here legally, or they need to attend universities in their homeland, whatever that is — whether it's China or Russia or Mexico, I don't really care."
Courtney Kuhlen/Kansan
Christopher Heath, Monterey, Calif., senior, is one of the plaintiffs suing the state of Kansas for injunctive relief, asking the court to nullify the Kansas House bill that allows some undocumented immigrants to pay in-state college tuition. Heath, who will be starting his third year of paying out-of-state tuition, said he thought the bill was unfair to people in his position.
Melinda Lewis, the policy director of El Centro, a Kansas City, Kan., nonprofit organization that played a significant role in drafting the Kansas law, said she believed many of the students joined the suit because they wanted education finance reform, not because they held anti-immigrant views.
"I've read the stories of some of the plaintiffs who are working hard and who are struggling to pay for college," Lewis said. "And I think that those things are very real, but I do not think that in any way they are the fault of immigrant students, who in many ways are struggling right along with the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs are, I believe, unwitting pawns in a larger goal of this extreme anti-immigrant group to try to create an environment of fairly radical immigrant views."
The case has received significant media attention since being filed July 19.
largely because the attorney who brought the case on behalf of FAIR was Kris Kobach, a University of Missouri-Kansas City law professor who is currently campaigning in the Republican primary for Kansas' third district Congressional seat. Kobach has made immigration reform a priority in his campaign thus far, and has appeared on The Reilly Factor to discuss the issue. Kobach did not return calls seeking
comment for this article.
Last week, Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline removed himself from defense of the case, saying that his belief in strong immigration law presented a conflict of interest. Tully said she was waiting to hear from FAIR's attorneys about the state's response to the suit in the wake of Kline's refusal.
— Edited by John Scheirman